In one of the great reversals of historical judgement, the
massacre of thousands of Polish officers at Katyn during World War 2,
originally blamed on the Nazis, has come to be accepted as one of Stalin’s
major “crimes”.
The Wikipedia Katyn Massacre site (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_Massacre
) provides a lengthy explanation of how this reversal occurred. The judgement was sealed in 1990 when the
Russians officially accepted the blame for the massacre, citing a 1940 proposal
by Beria to execute 25,700 Polish officers. The proposal was counter-signed by
Stalin, Molotov, Voroshilov and Mikoyan.
The Russian confession was a final repudiation of the era of
Stalin. The repudiation had begun in
1956 with Khrushchev’s so-called “Secret Speech” to the 20th
Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Between 1956 and 1990, Soviet leaders undid
much of the socialist collective economy of the Soviet Union and retreated from
core elements of the theories of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin.
For nearly a quarter of a century the new orthodoxy of
Katyn-as-Stalin’s-crime has become accepted fact in the mainstream media and
history text books. It has built on and
further consolidated the anti-communist hostility that creates so many barriers
to people working for the overthrow of capitalism and imperialism.
However, new developments may presage the reversal of the
reversal. History may be forced to
rewrite its malicious judgements on Stalin.
Firstly, Russian Duma (parliament) member Viktor Iliukhin
has produced materials that cast doubt on the authenticity of the “Beria letter”
to Stalin. If you have the time and the
interest to pursue this matter, go to Grover Furr’s “The Katyn Forest Whodunnit”
page here: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/pol/truthaboutkatyn.html
Secondly, a joint Polish-Ukrainian group of archaeologists
has unearthed evidence that persons listed on Soviet transportation documents
could not have been killed by the Soviets, but were in all likelihood captured
by the Nazis and shot at a later date.
The transportation lists name persons held in POW camps by the Soviets
who were being moved to labour battalions.
Anti-communists such as Anna Cienciala et. al. (see Katyn: A Crime Without Punishment) have simply declared that these
are lists of persons identified to be executed by the Soviets at Katyn. The new evidence strongly suggests that the
lists are what they claim to be. The
fact that a Polish prisoner’s name is on a Soviet transportation list can no
longer be said to constitute proof that the prisoner was earmarked for
execution.
Grover Furr, a multilingual professor of medieval English
literature at Montclair State University at New Jersey in the US has translated
documents relating to the new evidence and constructed a compelling account of
the falsity surrounding the new Katyn orthodoxy.
This is available here: http://msuweb.montclair.edu/~furrg/research/furr_katyn_preprint_0813.pdf
It is the pre-publication version of the peer-reviewed
final, published as Grover Furr. "The 'Official' Version of the Katyn
Massacre Disproven? Discoveries at a German Mass Murder Site in Ukraine." Socialism
and Democracy 27:2 (August 2013), 96-129.
I said in an earlier post that history will in all
probability be kinder to Stalin than are the strident critics of our present
era.
Grover’s article gives me further confidence that this
will be the case.
2 comments:
Wishful thinking on your part. Furr has discovered nothing newbut has gone to considereable trouble to muddy the waters while Illiukin's so called discoveries have gained wide acceptance even in Russia.
How do you know that Anna Cienciala was an an anti-communist? that is Grover Furr's phrase, used in his latest article. Do you just take his word in most matters? Cienciala at least studdied the subject for years as a trained historian rather than the ideologically driven Furr, who just a dilettante.
The findings of the Polish archeological dig did not find new evidence that conclusively disproves Cienciala's position. Furr referrs to one name - that nnot enough sport, when over 20,000 people were killed.
Wishful thinking on your part. Furr has discovered nothing newbut has gone to considereable trouble to muddy the waters while Illiukin's so called discoveries have not gained wide acceptance even in Russia.
How do you know that Anna Cienciala was an an anti-communist? that is Grover Furr's phrase, used in his latest article. Do you just take his word in most matters? Cienciala at least studdied the subject for years as a trained historian rather than the ideologically driven Furr, who just a dilettante.
The findings of the Polish archeological dig did not find new evidence that conclusively disproves Cienciala's position. Furr referrs to one name - that nnot enough sport, when over 20,000 people were killed.
Post a Comment