Friday, November 08, 2024

Chinese Maoists ask: What does it mean to suffer twice and be punished twice?

 Two interesting observations from contemporary capitalist China


"Suffering twice and being punished twice" is what we, the post-60s generation, often wrote in our essays when we were in school. The background at that time was to criticize Lin Biao and Confucius, and later it was to fight back against the rightist trend of reversing verdicts and criticize the capitalist-roaders, all of which were about class struggle. The general meaning of the whole sentence is: If their conspiracy to restore the old order succeeds, we, the poor and lower-middle peasants (or the working class), will suffer twice and be punished twice. These two times of suffering and two crimes refer to the old society, which means that if we follow their path, the working class and peasant class will return to the dark old society and work like slaves for others. We were born in the new society and have no idea what life was like in the old society, how much suffering there was, and what kind of punishment we suffered?

Today, I say "suffer twice, be punished twice", because I think the saying at that time is still quite effective and reasonable. Isn't it the case now? Thirty years in the east, thirty years in the west, the workers and peasants who have been liberated are now oppressed again.

At the bottom, those who are laid off are laid off, those who lose their lands lose their lands. Most people live at the bottom of society, and it is estimated that they will never be able to turn over and become masters of their own destiny as before. In China today, people without real power have no voice, let alone the ability to defend their rights. Under the oppression of the system, although some people get a lot of money, they are bitter, depressed, and numb inside. The machine gun of power is wantonly shooting at the head of dignity. It is an extremely abnormal social phenomenon that the majority of people are controlled by a few people to do whatever they want. Therefore, a large part of us will "suffer twice and be punished twice". This suffering is material, but more of it is spiritual. This is a sad world. Pu Xianhong's BLOG

Since ancient times, "Those who work with their minds rule over others, and those who work with their hands are ruled by others." Only the era under Mao's leadership was an exception. Mao Zedong once said: "I don't want to see the phenomenon of people exploiting people again on the land of China, and capitalists, business owners, hired workers, prostitutes and opium smokers appear again; if that happens, the blood of many martyrs will be shed in vain..." Mao Zedong also said: "Born in adversity, die in comfort." "Wang Anshi once said in his later years, 'The overlord took the two rivers alone, and his descendants mostly surrendered with hundreds of cities (a line from Wang Anshi's four poems "Recalling the Past in Nanjing")'.  We must learn from the experience and lessons of history and prevent ourselves from being "peacefully evolved" by bourgeois ideology; otherwise, wouldn't the blood of so many of our revolutionary martyrs have been shed in vain? Even if you sit in a spacious and bright modern office today, you will experience the system of slave society and know what slaves and slave owners are. They oppress you mentally and exploit you economically. In such an environment, the Chinese people live without any dignity in order to survive. It seems that we have returned to feudal society and slave society.

………………….

Suffering twice, being punished twice: Little Red Building in Shanghai, minors in Xi'an

2021-12-8 22:40 | Posted by: Antarctic | Views: 5692 | Comments: 4 | Original author: Red Guardian | From: Red Song Network

Abstract : In 1959, during the Hangzhou Conference, Chairman Mao said something about peaceful evolution: "I don't want the phenomenon of man exploiting man to appear again on the land of China, and capitalists, business owners, hired workers, prostitutes and opium addicts to appear again; if that happens, the blood of many martyrs will be shed in vain..." That...

  In 1959, during the Hangzhou Conference, Chairman Mao spoke about peaceful evolution and said:

  "I don't want the day when the phenomenon of man exploiting man, capitalists, business owners, hired workers, prostitutes and opium addicts will appear again on the land of China; if that happens, the blood of many martyrs will be shed in vain..."

  At that time, probably many people did not quite understand this sentence.

  He was worried that the people would suffer twice and be punished twice. In order to prevent the phenomenon of man exploiting man again on the Chinese land, the old man was ready to smash it to pieces. Concerned about the country and the people, he did his best.

  Before his death, many people found it difficult to understand why this weathered old man, who had sacrificed six of his relatives for the revolution, would not take a break but continue to fight.

  However, decades later, his worries became a reality.

  In the Shanghai Xiaohonglou (Liitle Red Building) case, Zhao Fuqiang used violence to force women into prostitution, accumulating 1 billion yuan in 20 years, and was not arrested until 2019. Beating, imprisonment, insults, egg extraction, severing fallopian tubes, and filming sex videos, the methods he used to enslave and control women are hard to imagine, but this is indeed what happened in 2019.

  Du Yuesheng, a Shanghai gangster, would be ashamed of himself if he saw such means. He was rampant in Yangpu District, Shanghai, and many political and legal officials escorted him. The victims went to the police station to report to the police, but it was useless. The collusion between officials and businessmen made people despair. Just the night before Zhao Fuqiang was arrested, Lu Yan, the former secretary of the Political and Legal Committee of the Yangpu District Committee, pulled him into the office and complained to him, "Go quickly, the net will be closed soon ." If it weren't for the victims' desperate reports, no one knows how long the crimes of the Little Red Building would continue.

  In Xi'an, the Huashang Daily reported a case of forcing a minor into prostitution. A 13-year-old girl who was on leave from school to work was beaten, burned with cigarette butts, and forced to take nude photos. She had been "serving customers" for more than half a month. When she was rescued, her body was still covered with scars. When she parted her hair, she saw blood on her head. Ironically, she was rescued because a client had a change of heart.

  It is true that the secretary in Shanghai has no bottom line, while the clients in Xi'an have a conscience.

  What does it mean to suffer twice and be punished twice? After this painful experience, we should have woken up, right?

  Faced with such a tragedy, should we remain indifferent, gloat over its misfortune, or thank God that it did not happen to us?

  Is this a coincidence?

  The author searched the Internet for relevant information and found that there are news about pornography in Xi'an almost every year. A dozen villages in the city have been in the news because of streetwalkers. The most famous of them is of course Jixiang Village. "Come here, auntie will tell you something" has become a well-known laughing stock. News about forcing minors to accompany drinking and prostitution has also become commonplace.

  The measure of women's liberation is the natural measure of universal liberation. Women and even girls as young as 12 or 13 are forced into prostitution, which shows how serious the problem is. In the early days of the founding of the People's Republic of China, in order to eliminate pornography, gambling and drugs, the People's Government made continuous efforts to transform a large number of fallen women into self-reliant workers, and then announced in 1964 that venereal diseases and open and hidden prostitution had been completely eliminated.

  Why have prostitution, gambling and drugs, which have been eradicated, become rampant again? Why were the poor Chinese able to enjoy dignity back then, but are now forced to sell themselves out?

  When public ownership turns into private ownership, everyone thinks they can get rich, but the reality is that only a few people get rich while the majority become workers for the capitalists. Under the exploitation of capital, on the one hand, the rich enjoy wine and meat, while on the other hand, people freeze to death on the road. In order to survive, many people have to give up their dignity and sell their bodies. In places where people cannot see and where the masses cannot supervise, it is difficult for unrestrained power to resist the temptation to take a share of the pie.

  However, people who have suffered twice and been punished twice should be able to see the reality more clearly, understand Chairman Maos painstaking efforts, and seek new ways to liberation.

 


Saturday, August 17, 2024

My letter to Peter Dutton, Leader of the Opposition

 The Leader of the Australian Opposition, the despicable racist ad reactionary Peter Dutton, has said that Australia should not take in refugees or grant any form of visa to Palestinians from Gaza, because they may be terrorists. However, he is happy for Jewish Australian citizens to serve in the genocidal and terrorist Israeli Defence Force, and to take in Israeli citizens applying to come to Australia.

I have sent him the following letter to remind him of the cruel inhumanity of his attitude towards the victims of Israel's aggression.

.................................

(Address supplied_

18 August 2024

 

Dear Mr Dutton

Could you please…


show…



a little more…



compassion…


 


to the non-combatant…



victims…



 

of Israeli aggression…



and genocide…



 

in the West Bank and Gaza…



and their families (or what’s left of them).



Thank you,

(name supplied)

73-year old 5th generation white Australian.


Thursday, May 09, 2024

Mao Zedong: My Thought is not a new stage, "but no one listens to me".

 

Critique and revision of the editorial article “Leninism, or social imperialism?” Criticisms and corrections of the draft submitted for review[1] (3 April 1970)

1

This article is well-written and has been read, and I am waiting to read another one. It seems to be enough to use this one, and it can be used by two newspapers and one magazine. I've deleted a few paragraphs of my words[2], which are useless and offensive to others. Don't write such words. I have said this a hundred times, but no one listens to me. I don't know why, so please ask the comrades of the Central Committee to look into it. I've kept a few paragraphs of useful words, but not all of them, as far as offensive words are concerned. Please take note of the above.

Mao Zedong

3 April 1970

Please rearrange the footnote numbers because a few paragraphs have been deleted.

2

But history has its twists and turns. Just as after the death of Engels there was the revisionism of Bernstein and Kautsky, so after the death of Stalin there was the revisionism of Khrushchev and Brezhnev.

Eleven years after Khrushchev came to power, a split occurred within revisionism, and Brezhnev replaced Khrushchev. It took him more than five years, but such a person is now presiding over the ‘commemoration’ in the USSR of the centenary of Lenin's birth.

3

The ‘Slavic empire’ of the old tsar has long since come to nothing. The tsarist rule itself was eliminated by the Great October Revolution led by Lenin in 1917, and the rule of the old tsar was over. In today's era of total collapse of imperialism, the new tsar's attempt to re-establish a bigger empire to dominate the whole world can only be a dream.

…………………..

(In the second footnote, there is a reference to Khrushchev’s “three-no-world”. In his Secret Speech to the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in 1956, Nikita Khrushchev criticized the policies of Joseph Stalin. One of the key elements of his speech was the repudiation of Stalin's alleged personality cult. Khrushchev highlighted three main aspects, often referred to as the "three no's":

No to the cult of personality: Khrushchev condemned the alleged excessive glorification of Stalin's personality and his elevation to almost god-like status within the Soviet Union.

·       No to arbitrariness in decision-making: Khrushchev criticized Stalin's alleged autocratic style of leadership, which often led to arbitrary decisions and the suppression of dissenting voices within the party.

·        No to violations of socialist legality: Khrushchev criticized Stalin for numerous alleged human rights abuses, including purges, forced labor camps (Gulags), and executions carried out without due process, which violated socialist legal principles. – Translator)



[1] “Leninism or Social Imperialism?” was written to commemorate the centenary of Lenin's birth. The original title of the revised draft sent by Zhou Enlai and others to Mao Zedong for review on 1 April 1970 was “Leninism and Soviet Social Imperialism”, but when Mao Zedong reviewed it, he changed it to “Leninism or Social Imperialism?” The first part of this article is Mao Zedong's comments on the draft for review; the second part of this article is the two paragraphs he added to the draft for review; and the third part of this article is his revision of a paragraph in the draft for review. This article was later published by the editorial departments of the People's Daily, the Red Flag magazine, and the PLA Daily in the 22 April 1970 issue of the People's Daily, the PLA Daily, and the 1 May issue of the Red Flag magazine.

[2] On pages 1 and 2 of the draft submitted for review on 1 April 1970, Mao Zedong deleted the following passage: “Chairman Mao, the greatest Marxist-Leninist of our time and our great leader, pointed out: ’The doctrine of Leninism has developed Marxism. In what ways has it developed? Firstly, in its world view (that is, materialism and dialectics); secondly, in the theory of revolution, revolutionary tactics, the party, class struggle and the dictatorship of the proletariat, and many other issues. Lenin had the doctrine of the world view, the doctrine of the dictatorship of the proletariat and the doctrine of the construction of socialism. Lenin had seven years of practice in socialist construction, which Marx did not have.’‘’ On the second and third pages, the following four paragraphs were deleted: “For half a century, Comrade Mao Zedong, in leading China in the great struggle to complete the New Democratic Revolution, in leading China in the great struggle for socialist revolution and socialist construction, and in leading the contemporary international communist movement in its great struggle against imperialism, against modern revisionism, and against the reactionaries of all countries, has inherited, defended and developed Marxism-Leninism, raising it to a brand-new stage, that is, the stage of Mao Zedong Thought. Combining the universal truths of Marxism-Leninism with the concrete practice of the revolution, he inherited, defended and developed Marxism-Leninism, and raised Marxism-Leninism to a brand-new stage, that is, that of Mao Zedong Thought.” ‘’Mao Tse-tung Thought is the Marxism-Leninism of an era when imperialism is heading for total collapse and socialism is heading for worldwide victory.‘’ “Comrade Mao Tse-tung is the Lenin of our time.” ‘It is precisely because of the victories of the proletarian world revolution and the death struggle of imperialism that the struggle between contemporary Marxism-Leninism and revisionism is more intense than at any other time in history. At the very beginning of Khrushchev's revisionism, Chairman Mao, our great leader, had an insight into the serious danger of modern revisionism to the cause of the proletarian revolution. Under the leadership of Chairman Mao, together with the Party of Labour of Albania, headed by the great Marxist-Leninist Comrade Enver Hoxha, and true Marxist-Leninists all over the world, Chairman Mao has time and again repelled the counter-currents of modern revisionism and defended Marxism-Leninism. This is of extremely far-reaching historical significance to the cause of the world proletarian revolution and the liberation of the oppressed peoples.” On page 5, the following three paragraphs were deleted: “Comrade Mao Tse-tung also pointed out incisively: ’One word can raise a nation, while one word can destroy a nation. When Marx spoke of the dictatorship of the proletariat, he said that one word that could create a nation; when Khrushchev spoke of a three-no-world, a state of the whole people and a party of the whole people, he said one word could kill a nation.’’ “Comrade Mao Tse-tung is referring to a socialist state when he talks about the rise and fall of the state. There is socialism only when there is dictatorship of the proletariat; without dictatorship of the proletariat, there is no socialism.” “Comrade Mao Zedong comprehensively summed up the historical experience of the dictatorship of the proletariat, both positive and negative, and with genius and creativity applied materialistic dialectics to analyse the contradictions of socialist society, expose the laws of socialist society, found the doctrine of continued revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat, and personally initiated and led China's Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, which resolved the problems of consolidating the proletariat both theoretically and practically. He personally initiated and led the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution in China, solving in theory and practice the most important contemporary problem of consolidating the dictatorship of the proletariat and preventing the restoration of capitalism. This is an epoch-making contribution to the cause of world proletarian revolution.”

 

Mao Zedong: Don't say my Thought "is a brand-new stage in the development of Marxism-Leninism"

 

Criticism of the draft communiqué of the 12th Plenary Session of the 8th Expanded Central Committee of the Communist Party of China[1]

(October 1968)

1

Issued for discussion by comrades in plenary.

2

This sentence is not to be used here.[2]

3

There is a slight modification.[3]

 

 

(Translated from Collected Works of Mao Zedong, Vol 50, pp 305-06)

 



[1] This Part 1 and 2 were written on the draft communiqué of the Twelfth Plenary Session of the Eighth Expanded Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC), which was submitted for review on 28 October 1968; this Part 3 was written on the draft communiqué submitted for review on 30 October. This communiqué was adopted by the Plenary on 31 October and published in the People's Daily on 2 November.

[2] In the draft communiqué submitted for examination on 28 October 1968, it was written: ‘The Plenum is of the opinion that the great victory of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution has further proved that Mao Tse-tung's thought is a brand-new stage in the development of Marxism-Leninism, and that it has further proved the extremely far-reaching significance of Comrade Mao Tse-tung's doctrine of continuing the revolution under the dictatorship of the proletariat. When Mao Zedong reviewed the draft communiqué, he deleted the sentence ‘further proves that Mao Zedong Thought is a brand-new stage in the development of Marxism-Leninism’ from the text and wrote this criticism. In addition, in this paragraph of the draft communiqué, it was stated that Mao Zedong Thought ‘is the only guiding ideology for all the work of the whole Party, the whole army and the whole country’, but Mao Zedong, when reviewing the draft communiqué, deleted the word ‘only’ from the text.

[3] Mao Zedong's amendments to the draft submitted for review on 30 October 1968 mainly consisted of deleting the following sentence: ‘The great popularity of Mao Tse-tung's thought among the masses of the country as a whole is a very great achievement of this Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.’

Tuesday, April 23, 2024

Australian billionaires

 


It is a triumph

of free enterprise, surely,

that in 2024 our country is

lucky to have 159 billionaires

with a total wealth of $503 billion.

 

Australians all, let us rejoice:

 

The desperate-to-play soccer

seven-year old whose parents

cannot afford

soccer club fees;

the old woman who may as well

live in a shoe, cramping in the cold

of her car, her home – her rent now paid

in rego fees and petrol prices;

the farmer who wants a life

and cannot even think about

those who will have to scrape his

body parts from the tree into which

he so desperately drives;

those whose hopes and dreams

are sacrificed in dozens of types

of gambling; the tjilpi drawing circles

in the dust with his toes, while the mining

company rips at the treasures beneath his feet.

 

And I haven’t even

scratched the surface yet

of the hurt and despair…

 

But there are 159 billionaires

Who make us what we are

 

“Young and free”

 

The rich man in his castle

The poor man at his gate

There’s no greater love

Than feeling class hate.

 

23 April 2024


Friday, April 12, 2024

Mao Zedong: Disagreeing with the reference to Maoism.

 

不同意毛泽东主义的提法

1948815日)

吴玉章(1)同志,

未元电(2)悉。那样说是很不适当的。现在没有什么毛泽东主义,因此不能说毛泽东主义。不是什么“主要的要学毛泽东主义”,而是必须号召学生们学习马恩列斯的理论和中国革名的经验。这里所说的“中国革命的经验”是包括中国共产党人(毛泽东也是在内)根据马恩列斯理论所写的某些小册子及党中央各顶规定路线和政策的文件在内。另外,有些同志在刊物上将我的名字和马恩列斯并列,说成什么“马恩列斯毛”,也是错误的。你的说法和这后一种说法都是不合实际的,是无益 有害的,必定坚决反对这样说。

毛泽东

未删

(1)     吴玉章 (1878-1966), 四川容县人。当时任华北大学校长。

(2)     指吴玉章1948813日給周恩来的电报。 在电报中,吴玉章表示在华北大学成立典礼上提出“主要的要学毛泽东主义” “把毛泽东思想改成毛泽东主义“。 对这样的提法”是否妥当“,请周恩来”同主席和少奇同志商量后,赐以指示“。

 

Disagreeing with the reference to Maoism.

(August 15, 1948)

Comrade Wu Yuzhang, 1

We have just received your letter. That would be very inappropriate. There is no such thing as Maoism now, so you can't say Maoism. Instead of "mainly studying Maoism", students must be called upon to study the theories of the Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and the experience of the Chinese Revolution. The "experience of the Chinese Revolution" here includes certain pamphlets written by the Chinese Communists (including Mao Zedong) on the basis of the theories of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin as well as documents of the Central Committee of the Communist Party setting out its lines and policies. In addition, some comrades have wrongly juxtaposed my name with that of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin in their publications, saying something like "Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin-Mao". This is also wrong. Both your statement and this latter one are unrealistic, unhelpful and harmful, and must be strongly rejected.

Mao Zedong

Unabridged

(1)   Wu Yuzhang (1878-1966) was a native of Rongxian, Sichuan. At that time, he was the president of North China University.

(2)   (1) This refers to a telegram dated 13 August 1948 from Wu Yuchang to Zhou Enlai. In the telegram, Wu Yuzhang stated that at the inauguration ceremony of the North China University, he had proposed that "the main thing to be learnt is Maoism" and that "Mao Zedong Thought should be changed into Maoism". Zhou Enlai was asked to "discuss with the Chairman and Comrade Shaoqi and give instructions" as to whether such a proposal was "appropriate".

 

Translated from the Collected Works of Mao Zedong Vol 24 p.371 - 24-sm.pdf (bannedthought.net)