Author:
Angry Frown Viewpoint Published: 2021-09-15 Source: National Revival Website
The term
"bourgeois right" first appeared in Marx's "Critique of the
Gotha Programme" in 1875. He argued that since socialist society was a new
form of society born out of the old capitalist society, it inevitably bore many
traces of the old society, and these traces were concentrated in the form of a
formally equal but substantively unequal right of the capitalist class, which
is called bourgeois right.
In his
Critique of the Gotha Platform, he states, "This right to equality is an
unequal right to unequal labour ...... but it tacitly assumes that the unequal
personal gifts of the worker, and thus the unequal capacity to work, are
natural privileges. So as far as its content is concerned, it is an unequal
right like all rights."
On this
basis, Marx concludes that "to avoid all these evils, rights should not be
equal, but unequal".
What does
it mean? It means simply that in a socialist society there are still
differences in the individual talents of each worker, in their ability to work,
in the influence of public opinion and so on, so that even if one starts from
the socialist principle of equality of equal work for equal product, the
consumer goods actually received by each person are still unequal.
Therefore,
a socialist society should treat the same situations equally and treat
different situations unequally in proportion to their inequality. If not,
existing disparities will be widened and even polarised.
Why, then,
did Chairman Mao not simply eliminate this bourgeois right at that time? The
answer is that bourgeois right could not be completely eliminated in the newly
established socialist society.
This is
because, firstly, bourgeois right has certain innate characteristics. Things
like working ability and intelligence, for example, are sometimes innate, and
the differences between them cannot and do not have to be smoothed out; it is
not humanly possible to do so. Indeed, this has existed objectively in all
historical forms since the beginning of mankind, and will probably continue to
do so even in a future communist society. But because of this, the impact of
this on the construction of a socialist society is so small as to be almost negligible.
Secondly,
since it has just been born out of the old capitalist society, a socialist
society is not yet able to establish a complete and comprehensive system of
public ownership of means of production for all people, and it is not possible
to establish a network of production according to the distribution of labour
that includes all workers in society. Due to the influence of old habits,
customs and thinking in a capitalist society, private factors and a capitalist
class will continue to arise to a certain extent and within a certain range.
Thirdly, bourgeois
right can be transformed into substantial capital and continue to multiply itself.
The second point is that in a newly established socialist society, private
elements and bourgeois elements will continue to emerge, and the influence of
public opinion of these constantly emerging bourgeois elements is still very
widespread, and they can use this influence of public opinion to continuously
appropriate the various factors of production and in turn expand their own
rights, thus creating further inequalities.
Fourthly,
bourgeois right has existed for so long that this old habit has inadvertently
shaped the way people think and act, so that they do not want to change and do
not want to make progress. As we all know, many people are slaves to their
habits and are willing to accept the status quo without complaint or question,
even though it might well be to their advantage to change the existing state of
affairs.
In conclusion,
bourgeois right cannot be completely eliminated in a socialist society, so it
is of the utmost importance to limit it so that it does not proliferate and
lead to a revival of capitalism.
Therefore,
the question of how to limit the development of bourgeois right under the
conditions of the dictatorship of the proletariat became a question that
Chairman Mao kept thinking about in his later years.
The answer
to the question of why Chairman Mao wanted to restrict the bourgeois right lies
in the words of the old man himself: the reactionary class, which has been
overthrown, is still trying to revive itself. In a socialist society, new
elements of the bourgeoisie would be created.
--Quoted in the People's Daily, 8 March 1978
(The words from Mao, above, read: "I don't want the day to come when there will be more exploitation of people in China, new capitalists, entrepreneurs, workers, prostitutes and opium smokers; if that happens, the blood of many martyrs will have been shed in vain.")
The answer
is clear enough. In order to prevent the revival of capitalism, to prevent the
continuous emergence of new capitalist elements, to prevent the workers and
peasants from suffering a second crop of hardship, to prevent the Red Mountain
from changing colour and the workers and peasants from changing sovereignty,
Chairman Mao wanted to restrict the legal power of the capitalist class.
...............
Chinese original at 为什么要限制资产阶级法权? (mzfxw.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment